In Re Lockheed Martin Corp. Securities Litigation

Good Law
272 F. Supp. 2d 928·2002 WL 32124003·2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 26471
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 2002CV 99-00372 MRP, CV 99-06171 MRPCalifornia7,203 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pfaelzer, J.

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Second Amended Class Action Complaint

Plaintiffs bring this class action on behalf of individuals who purchased Lockheed Martin Corporation stock between August 13, 1998 and December 23, 1998 (“the Class Period”). Lockheed and six of its top officers and directors — Vance Coff-man, Marcus Bennett, Norman Augustine, Vincent Marafino, James Blackwell, and Thomas Corcoran — are defendants (hereinafter “Lockheed”). Plaintiffs’ claims arise under §§ 10(b) & 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5.

On October 3, 2000 this Court granted a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint but pro vided leave to amend certain specified alie-gations. See Class Action Order (October 3, 2000). Plaintiffs filed their Consolidated Second Amended Complaint (“CSAC”) on December 15, 2000. Defendants second motion to dismiss was filed shortly thereafter. The Court heard oral argument on October 29, 2001 and took the matter under submission.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.INTRODUCTION.931

II.USING EVIDENCE OF INSIDER TRADING TO ESTABLISH SCIENTER: AUGUSTINE & MARAFINO.932

III. IDENTIFICATION OF SPECIFIC…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.