San Joaquin Raptor/Wildlife Rescue Center v. County of Stanislaus

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 830·27 Cal. App. 4th 713·32 Cal. Rptr. 2d 704·94 Daily Journal DAR 11306·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6212
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 12, 1994F019841California10,481 words

Opinion

Opinion

Buckley, J.

Appellants San Joaquin Raptor/Wildlife Rescue Center and John Mataka appeal from the judgment entered denying their complaint and petition for writ of mandate challenging the approval by respondent County of Stanislaus (County) of a proposal by respondent Arambel and Rose Development, Inc. (Arambel), to build a residential development near the existing community of Grayson, California. Appellants contend the environmental impact report (EIR) prepared in connection with the project did not comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

We will reverse. In so doing, we ratify the long-acknowledged purpose of an EIR, and the roles of a county board of supervisors and a reviewing court relative to CEQA. The purpose of an EIR is to provide enough information about a project so that the board of supervisors can make an informed decision thereon. Our role here, as a reviewing court, is not to decide whether the board acted wisely or unwisely, but simply to determine whether the EIR contained sufficient information about a proposed project, the site and surrounding area and the projected environmental impacts arising as a result of the proposed project or activity…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.