Breedlove

Breedlove v. Municipal Court

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 790·27 Cal. App. 4th 60·32 Cal. Rptr. 2d 400·94 Daily Journal DAR 10779·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5952
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 29, 1994A065396California1,830 words

Opinion

Opinion

Dossee, J.

Background

Petitioner Zerrel Breedlove seeks extraordinary relief to prohibit respondent Contra Costa County Municipal and Superior Courts from violating Penal Code section 1204.5 by reviewing a “pre-preliminary hearing” report or any other summary of the facts of his case or criminal record, prior to his entry of a plea or finding or verdict of guilt, and absent his consent. As will be seen, we grant the writ.

There is no dispute that the process challenged by Breedlove is a regular practice of respondent courts. Since January 1, 1993, the Superior and Municipal Courts of Contra Costa County, as part of a criminal trial coordination program (Gov. Code, §68112), have followed certain standard procedures. When a defendant charged with a felony appears in municipal court and pleads not guilty, three court dates are set: (a) a pre-preliminary hearing conference before one of the superior court judges, sitting as a magistrate, assigned to the coordination program; (b) a readiness conference set before the same superior court judge; and (c) a preliminary hearing set in the municipal court. The timing of the three varies according to whether the defendant has waived time. (§…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.