Sprint

SAUL ZAENTZ CO. v. Sprint

Good Law
272 F. Supp. 2d 927·2003 WL 21710151·2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25328
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 22, 2003C-02-1956-SCCalifornia366 words

Opinion

Opinion

Conti, J.

PERMANENT INJUNCTION

WHEREAS, this action was filed on or about April 22, 2002 (the “Action”); and

WHEREAS, the parties to this Action are plaintiff The Saul Zaentz Company (“Zaentz”) and Sprint Spectrum L.P. (“Sprint”), sued herein as Sprint, a corporation (collectively, the “Parties”); and

WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to a confidential resolution of the Action; and

WHEREAS, as a part of that resolution, Sprint has consented to the entry of a permanent injunction against it as detailed below; and

WHEREAS, good cause for entry of such an order appearing to the Court:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Sprint, its agents (including, without limitation, Publicis & Hal Riney and Harvest), employees and all persons in active concert with it, are permanently enjoined from publishing, broadcasting, disseminating or using in any manner the television commercial that is the subject of this Action (the “Commercial”) or any version or draft of the Commercial, or any future version of the Commercial that is- substantially similar under U.S. copyright law to the film “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest”;

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that each party…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.