Coastal Delivery Corp. v. United States Customs Service

Good Law
272 F. Supp. 2d 958·2003 WL 21507775·2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19183
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJune 13, 2003CV 02-3838WMB(MANx)California4,396 words

Opinion

Opinion

Byrne, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT UNITED STATES CUSTOMS SERVICE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

I. Introduction

To help determine damages in a different, unrelated lawsuit, plaintiff Coastal Delivery Corp. (“Coastal”) filed a complaint under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) seeking information regarding the number of examinations performed on merchandise arriving into the Los Ange-les/Long Beach seaport. Defendant, the United States Customs Service (“Customs”), maintains that the information is protected under exemptions to FOIA because terrorists and others could use the information to discover the rate of inspection and then direct their containers to vulnerable ports.

A. Facts

The following facts are undisputed unless stated otherwise. Plaintiff, a trucking company, entered into an contract with a company called NISCO Pacific Warehouse (“NISCO”), a Centralized Examination Station (“CES”) for the U.S. Customs Service. When containers arrive at the Los Angeles/Long Beach port, Customs designates certain containers, for inspection off-site at a Centralized Examination Station. Under the contract, plaintiff was to be the exclusive transporter of designated containers from the port…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.