United Guaranty Mortgage Indemnity Co. v. Countrywide Financial Corp.

Good Law
660 F. Supp. 2d 1163·2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96283
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 2009Case CV-09-1888-MRP (JWJx)California14,126 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pfaelzer, J.

ORDER Granting Motions to Dismiss the Amended Complaint

In this mortgage insurance case, an insurer (“United Guaranty”) sues two affiliated mortgage companies (collectively, “Countrywide”; separately, “Countrywide Financial” and “Countrywide Home”) and a mortgage securitization trustee (“BNY Trust”).

The original complaint asserted contract, tort, and statutory claims. Countrywide and BNY Trust moved to dismiss the original complaint. The claims for breach of contract and breach of implied covenant survived. The other claims were dismissed with leave to amend, primarily for failure to overcome the economic loss rule, which generally bars tort claims for contractual breaches.

United Guaranty then filed the Amended Complaint (“AC”). Now before the Court are motions to dismiss the tort and statutory claims reasserted in the AC. The motions are granted in their entirety.

I.

BACKGROUND

A. Procedural posture.

This insurance dispute has generated three court cases and several arbitrations. Two of the cases are pending before this Court.

United Guaranty filed the present case in this Court. The other case was filed by Countrywide in California state court; United Guaranty…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.