Kenneally

Kenneally v. MEDICAL BOARD OF CA.

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 802·27 Cal. App. 4th 489·32 Cal. Rptr. 2d 504·94 Daily Journal DAR 10965·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6036
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 4, 1994B075024California4,244 words

Opinion

Opinion

Grignon, J.

The Medical Board of California appeals from a preliminary injunction staying a physician disciplinary hearing until the physician has the opportunity to conduct certain prehearing depositions. The physician contends Government Code, section 11511, part of the Administrative Procedure Act (Gov. Code § 11340 et seq.), denies him equal protection by restricting prehearing depositions in physician disciplinary proceedings to those witnesses whose testimony is material and who are unable or cannot be compelled to attend the hearing, when such depositions are not similarly restricted in attorney disciplinary proceedings. We conclude a physician has no fundamental right, for equal protection purposes, to continue to practice his or her profession. Accordingly, in reviewing the challenged statute, we apply the “rational basis” test rather than the “strict scrutiny” test. Finding Government Code section 11511 to be rationally based, we reverse.

Facts and Procedural Background

In April 1990, the Board filed an accusation charging Leo F. Kenneally, M.D., with gross negligence and incompetence in performing abortions on six patients, three of whom died. The accusation also charged…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.