Koehl

Koehl v. Verio, Inc.

Good Law
142 Cal. App. 4th 1313·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1387·2006 Daily Journal DAR 12439·48 Cal. Rptr. 3d 749·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8684
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 2006A108972, A110110, A110447California10,316 words

Opinion

Opinion

Richman, J.

Appellants are Jeffrey Koehl, Wendy Lingo, Terrence McCarthy, and John Brehm (when referred to collectively, Appellants), former sales associates at respondent Verio, Inc. (Verio). Appellants’ compensation plans provided for base pay and commissions, which commissions were paid when an order was booked, but which Verio could recover, or charge back, if certain conditions were not met. The fundamental question presented by this appeal is whether the commissions were wages, thus making the chargebacks unlawful under section 221 of the Labor Code. The trial court concluded that the commissions were not wages, and entered judgment for Verio. Our review leads to the same conclusion, and we affirm.

I. Factual Background

A. The Parties

Verio is an Internet service provider that sells Internet access and Web hosting services. Its Internet access customers are predominantly businesses with high volume Internet needs that generally require the purchase and installation of equipment and hardware in order to obtain ongoing Internet access through fiber optic lines. In 2000, Verio was purchased by Nippon Telephone and Telegraph Corporation (NTT) and began doing business as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.