Markowitz

Markowitz v. Fidelity National Title Co.

Good Law
142 Cal. App. 4th 508·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1321·2006 Daily Journal DAR 11794·48 Cal. Rptr. 3d 217·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8325
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 31, 2006B179923California8,595 words

Opinion

Opinion

Willhite, J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Donald J. Markowitz (Donald) appeals from a judgment entered following the trial court’s granting of a motion for nonsuit in favor of Fidelity National Title Company (Fidelity). Donald brought the present action against Fidelity and other defendants, who are not parties to this appeal, based in part on the defendants’ failure to record a request for reconveyance of a deed of trust on Donald’s real property that secured a promissory note held by two of the defendants. Donald alleged that Fidelity, which acted as a sub-escrow in the transaction at issue, breached statutory and fiduciary duties it owed to him. The trial court granted Fidelity’s motion for nonsuit following Donald’s opening statement. Because we find that Donald did not, and could not under the factual circumstances alleged by him, establish that Fidelity owed any duty to him, we conclude that nonsuit was properly granted in favor of Fidelity. We therefore affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The present lawsuit arises out of nonjudicial foreclosure proceedings initiated by Mordechai Kachlon (Mordechai), his wife Monica Kachlon (Monica), and the trustee, Best…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.