In Re Farm Raised Salmon Cases

Good Law
142 Cal. App. 4th 805·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1339·2006 Daily Journal DAR 11927·48 Cal. Rptr. 3d 449·36 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20178
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 31, 2006B182901California3,503 words

Opinion

Opinion

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, Rex S. Heinke, David C. Allen, Johanna R. Shargel, Los Angeles; Streeter & Nangano, Thomas Barclay, Michael Nangano, Michael L. Coates, Los Angeles; Greenberg, Glusker, Fields, Claman, Machtinger & Kinsella, Norman Howard Levine, Los Angeles; Ervin, Cohen & Jessup, Allan B. Cooper, Beverly Hills, Tamara L. Dewar, Encino; O'Melveny & Myers, Carla J. Christofferson, Los Angeles; Seyfarth Shaw, Jay W. Connolly, San Francisco, and Geoff S. Long, for Defendants and Respondents.

Several individuals commenced separate actions against owners and operators of grocery stores alleging that the defendants sold artificially colored farmed salmon without disclosing to consumers the artificial coloring. The actions were coordinated in Farm Raised Salmon Cases, Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 4329. The plaintiffs filed a coordinated complaint alleging as a class and representative action counts for unfair competition, violation of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) (Civ.Code, § 1750 et seq.), false advertising, and negligent misrepresentation. The superior court sustained a demurrer to the complaint on the grounds that the Federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.