Grassilli

Grassilli v. Barr

Good Law
142 Cal. App. 4th 1260·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1384·2006 Daily Journal DAR 12383·48 Cal. Rptr. 3d 715·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8695
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 2006D044931California13,366 words

Opinion

Opinion

Haller, J.

Steven Grassilli brought a federal civil rights claim against several California Highway Patrol (CHP) officers, alleging these officers violated his constitutional rights by engaging in a series of actions against him because he complained about a CHP officer’s improper conduct. ( 42 U.S.C. § 1983 .) The first trial ended in a defense verdict. In a prior unpublished decision, we reversed the judgment because the trial court erroneously excluded evidence relevant to Grassilli’s constitutional retaliation claim. (Grassilli v. Barr (May 10, 2002, D037942) (Grassilli I).)

After a lengthy second trial, the jury found that CHP Officer Richard Barr and Sergeant Michael Toth wrongfully retaliated against Grassilli because Grassilli reported Officer Barr’s improper conduct to CHP management, and that Sergeant Toth and Sergeant Stephen Neumann were also liable for retaliation based on their positions as Officer Barr’s supervisory officers. The jury found the retaliation caused Grassilli to suffer $210,000 in economic damages and $290,000 in noneconomic damages. The jury awarded Grassilli $3 million in punitive damages against Officer Barr and approximately $1 million against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.