American International Specialty Lines Insurance v. Continental Casualty Insurance

Good Law
142 Cal. App. 4th 1342·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1388·2006 Daily Journal DAR 12505·49 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8751
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 16, 2006B179005California3,064 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ashmann-Gerst, J.

The question presented is whether respondents Continental Casualty Insurance Company (Continental), Gulf Underwriters Insurance Company (Gulf), and Admiral Insurance Company (Admiral) (collectively objecting insurers) are liable for equitable indemnity or equitable contribution to appellants American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company (American) and Lexington Insurance Company (Lexington) (collectively settling insurers). The settling insurers paid $21.5 million to fund a settlement and $3,214,612 in defense costs on behalf of Walt Disney Company (Disney) (the insured of Continental, American and Lexington) in connection with an action by Goto.Com, Inc. (Goto.com), against Disney and Infoseek Corporation (Infoseek) (the insured of Gulf and Admiral). The settling insurers sued the objecting insurers, who then moved for summary judgment, inter alia, due to lack of notice of the Goto.com action and settlement to Continental, and lack of coverage on the part of Gulf and Admiral. Summary judgment was entered for the objecting insurers, and the settling insurers appeal. We find no error and affirm the judgment.

CONTENTIONS

According to the settling insurers:

1.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.