People v. Palmer

Good Law
142 Cal. App. 4th 724·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1341·2006 Daily Journal DAR 11861·47 Cal. Rptr. 3d 864·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8292
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 31, 2006C049018California5,602 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sims, J.

Defendant Rex Evans Palmer entered a negotiated plea of no contest to driving while having a blood-alcohol content of .08 percent or more (Veh. Code, §23152, subd. (b); count II) and admitted two prior Nevada convictions for driving under the influence in exchange for dismissal of the remaining counts: driving under the influence (Veh. Code, §23152, subd. (a); count I), felony child endangerment (Pen. Code, § 273a, subd. (a); count III), as well as dismissal of another prior Nevada conviction for driving while impaired.

The court suspended imposition of sentence and granted summary probation for a term of five years subject to certain terms and conditions including 180 days in jail.

Defendant appeals. He obtained a certificate of probable cause (Pen. Code, § 1237.5) to challenge the use of his prior Nevada driving-under-the-influence convictions. He contends his prior Nevada convictions could not be used to enhance the punishment for his current California driving offense (Veh. Code, § 23546) because he did not have a right to a jury trial in the Nevada proceedings. We reject defendant’s claim. Since there is no federal constitutional right to a jury trial for petty…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.