Hightower

Hightower v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Sacramento

Good Law
142 Cal. App. 4th 759·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1326·2006 Daily Journal DAR 11857·48 Cal. Rptr. 3d 420·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8322
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 31, 2006B182153California3,364 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rubin, J.

Plaintiff Thomas A. Hightower sued the Roman Catholic Bishop of Sacramento (the bishop) for sexual abuse allegedly committed on him by a Catholic priest in the early 1970’s. Hightower appeals from the judgment entered after the trial court sustained without leave to amend the bishop’s demurrers to the complaint because the statute of limitations had expired. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiff Thomas A. Hightower sued the bishop based on allegations that he was lured into a life of sexual abuse at the hands of a priest, Mario Blanco, for a two-year period beginning in 1970 when Hightower was just 12 years old. According to Hightower’s first amended complaint, Blanco worked under the bishop’s supervision and the bishop was aware of Blanco’s behavior, but failed to take steps to protect Hightower or others. Hightower also alleges that he was turned into a child molester himself as a result of the abuse, which otherwise shattered his life and those of his various wives and children. He is currently serving a state prison sentence of 30 years to life for child molestation.

Effective in 2003, the Legislature amended Code of Civil Procedure section 340.1 to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.