Elnekave

Elnekave v. via Dolce Homeowners Ass'n

Good Law
142 Cal. App. 4th 1193·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1376·2006 Daily Journal DAR 12336·48 Cal. Rptr. 3d 663·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8641
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 2006B184526California2,701 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rubin, J.

Defendant Via Dolce Homeowners Association appeals from the judgment entered to enforce a settlement agreement with plaintiffs Israel and Sara Elnekave (Code Civ. Proc., § 664.6) in this action for water and mold damage to the Elnekaves’ condominium. Because only the association’s insurer and a third party representative agreed to the settlement, and not a member of its corporate board or a corporate officer, we reverse. The Elnekaves have cross-appealed, asking that if we reverse the judgment, we also reverse the concomitant order dismissing their complaint. We also reverse the dismissal order, and the Elnekaves’ action is restored.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Israel and Sara Elnekave owned a unit in a Marina Del Rey condominium complex. Their unit suffered mold damage from a water leak, forcing them to pay for extensive repairs. The Elnekaves sued the Lees, their neighbors who owned an adjoining unit, and Via Dolce Homeowners Association (HOA), the homeowners association for the condominium complex, claiming that the Lees and the HOA were responsible for the damage.

At a September 8, 2004, mandatory settlement conference, it appeared that an oral settlement was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.