McRae

McRae v. Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation

Good Law
142 Cal. App. 4th 377·48 Cal. Rptr. 3d 313
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 29, 2006A098073, A100745, A104701, A098330, A098910California8,590 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stein, J.

Dr. Margie McRae filed suit against her employer, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (the Department) and four individual defendants, seeking damages for discrimination and retaliation in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.).

The trial court granted summary judgment to the four individual defendants, and Dr. McRae appeals from an order awarding these defendants their costs. (Case Nos. A098330 & A098910.) The case proceeded to trial against the Department. The jury returned a verdict against Dr. McRae on her claim of discrimination, but awarded her $75,000 on her claim of retaliation. The Department appeals from the judgment entered on the jury’s verdict, and from postjudgment orders awarding attorney fees to Dr. McRae. (Case Nos. A098073, A100745, & A104701.)

We reverse, finding that the evidence does not support the jury’s verdict that Dr. McRae was the subject of actionable retaliation. We also reverse the orders awarding Dr. McRae her attorney fees. Finally, we affirm the order awarding costs to the individual defendants and remand the matter to the trial court to award costs to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.