Prince

Prince v. United National Insurance

Good Law
142 Cal. App. 4th 233·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1286·2006 Daily Journal DAR 11252·47 Cal. Rptr. 3d 727·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7933
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 24, 2006B185819California5,069 words

Opinion

Opinion

Manella, J.

Appellants Twila Prince and David Smith, Jr., appeal from the judgment entered after demurrer was sustained to their complaint against respondent United National Insurance Company (United National). The issue raised in this case is whether an insurance policy’s exclusion for injuries arising out of the use of an automobile precludes coverage for the deaths of two young children who were negligently left in a vehicle on a hot day by their foster mother. The trial court concluded that the exclusion applied, and sustained a demurrer in favor of respondent United National. We agree that the use of the automobile was a predominating cause of — and substantial factor in — the injuries to the children, and that the foster mother’s negligence was not independent from the use of the vehicle. We, therefore, affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The Complaint

Appellants’ complaint against United National was filed in February 2005. Also named as defendants were Fire Insurance Exchange and Mercury Casualty Co. According to the allegations of the complaint, appellants are the natural parents of Dakota Denzel Prince-Smith and Nehemaiha Nate Prince-Smith, who died while…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.