Wilson

Wilson v. Merritt

Good Law
142 Cal. App. 4th 1125·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1374·2006 Daily Journal DAR 12265·48 Cal. Rptr. 3d 630·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8568
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 2006G035929California5,062 words

Opinion

Opinion

Moore, J.

Plaintiff Charles M. Wilson (Wilson), a paraplegic, suffered a torn rotator cuff and a fractured shoulder during a manipulation under anesthesia procedure performed by a chiropractor, Dr. Mark Wardenburg (Wardenburg). Wardenburg was assisted during the procedure by a medical doctor, Dr. Andrew Walter Merritt (Merritt). Wilson filed a medical malpractice complaint against Merritt. Merritt made a motion for nonsuit, claiming he had no obligation to obtain Wilson’s informed consent to the procedure. The court granted the motion and judgment was entered in favor of Merritt. Wilson appeals.

Wilson, who says a previous surgical procedure rendered him a paraplegic, insists that no one ever warned him prior to the manipulation under anesthesia procedure that he could suffer either a fractured bone or a tom rotator cuff. He maintains that if anyone had warned him, he never would have had the procedure. He argues that the court erred in finding that Merritt, who purportedly had marketed and recommended the procedure and to whom Wilson had posed questions about possible complications, had no duty to obtain his informed consent to the procedure. We hold that whether Merritt had a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.