Thompson

Thompson v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
142 Cal. App. 4th 154·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1278·2006 Daily Journal DAR 11141·47 Cal. Rptr. 3d 702·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7772
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 22, 2006B174594California7,499 words

Opinion

Opinion

Todd, J.

Plaintiff and appellant Chad Allan Thompson, as Special Administrator, appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants and respondents the County of Los Angeles (County), Jerry Harper, Edward Baker, Robert Devot and Daniel Burt following a jury trial on appellant’s cause of action for liability under section 1983 of title 42 of the United States Code (section 1983). Appellant contends that the trial court improperly instructed the jury regarding the definition of deadly force, that it abused its discretion in excluding two reports concerning the conduct of the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department and the use of dogs in law enforcement, and that it erred in dismissing his third cause of action for liability under Civil Code section 52.1, subdivision (b).

We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Appellant’s Arrest and Injuries.

On February 8, 1991, appellant tried to steal two cars. The first attempt failed when the owner pulled the coil wire, killing the engine, and the second attempt failed when the owner telephoned for help. Shortly thereafter, Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Deputy Patrick Cleary responded to an attempted robbery and car theft call at a 7-Eleven…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.