Sierra Club v. United States

Good Law
23 F. Supp. 2d 1132·1998 WL 740753·48 ERC (BNA) 1453·1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16652
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 1998C-98-3213 CRBCalifornia8,599 words

Opinion

Opinion

Breyer, J.

ORDER

The National Park Service describes Yosemite as a “premiere masterwork of the natural world.” Any change to this masterwork should only take place after there has been strict compliance with all applicable environmental laws. It is in this context that plaintiff Sierra Club asks the Court to halt implementation of Phase One of the Yosemite Lodge Area Development Plan in Yosemite National Park. After reviewing the pleadings, conducting a site visit of the disputed area, and receiving the benefit of oral argument on October 8, 1998, the Court hereby grants plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction, for the reasons set forth below.

BACKGROUND

In January 1997, the Merced River in Yosemite Valley overflowed its banks during a severe flood. This flooding caused substantial damage to buildings in the Yosemite Lodge area, located near the base of Yosemite Falls. Fifty percent of the public lodging facilities and one hundred percent of employee housing were damaged or destroyed.

In response to the flood damage, the National Park Service (“NPS”) quickly developed a plan to construct new lodge facilities nearby so that it could continue to accommodate the same number of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.