Ramirez

People v. Ramirez

Good Law
1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 728·6 Cal. App. 4th 1583·8 Cal. Rptr. 2d 529·92 Daily Journal DAR 7445·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4658
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 2, 1992B054084California3,761 words

Opinion

Opinion

Johnson, J.

Appellant, Patrick Curtis Ramirez, appeals from a judgment of conviction for robbery following a jury trial. We affirm.

Facts and Proceedings Below

Appellant, Patrick C. Ramirez, was convicted after a jury trial of the November 12, 1989, robbery of a Radio Shack electronics store in Culver City. The jury found true the special allegation appellant used a firearm during the commission of the robbery.

Prior to trial, appellant made two motions relevant to this appeal. The first was his request for self-representation. After a series of delays and continuances, the court rescheduled trial for June 11, 1990. On that day, appellant formally moved for a substitution of counsel pursuant to People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118 [ 84 Cal.Rptr. 156 , 465 P.2d 44 ]. After a hearing on the matter, the court denied appellant’s Marsden motion. The court then notified the parties the case would be held over until Monday, June 18th. Appellant immediately made an impromptu request for self-representation. The court denied the request after appellant stated he would not be prepared to proceed to trial on June 18th.

The second motion was appellant’s pretrial motion to suppress evidence…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.