Beaty

Beaty v. Truck Insurance Exchange

Good Law
1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 698·6 Cal. App. 4th 1455·8 Cal. Rptr. 2d 593·92 Daily Journal DAR 7254·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4637
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 29, 1992C010475California4,049 words

Opinion

Opinion

Puglia, J.

The issue presented is whether an insurer violates the Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code, § 51 et seq., hereafter referred to as the Unruh Act) when it refuses to offer a couple cohabitating in a homosexual relationship the same insurance policy and at the same premium it regularly offers to married couples. Plaintiffs Larry Beaty and Boyce Hinman applied to defendant Truck Insurance Exchange for a joint umbrella liability insurance policy. Defendant denied the application because joint umbrella policies are issued only to married couples. Defendant offered instead to issue each plaintiff individual umbrella coverage. Plaintiffs refused because they wanted a joint policy at the same premium as would be charged a married couple.

Plaintiffs brought suit claiming, inter alia, defendant’s refusal to issue them a joint umbrella policy under the same terms and conditions as defendant offers to married couples constitutes unlawful discrimination in violation of the Unruh Act. The trial court sustained defendant’s demurrer without leave to amend and entered judgment of dismissal.

On appeal, plaintiffs reiterate their claim defendant violated the Unruh Act by unlawfully…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.