Frisone

TRIPLE a MANAGEMENT CO. v. Frisone

Bad Law
1999 Cal. App. LEXIS 55·69 Cal. App. 4th 520·81 Cal. Rptr. 2d 669·99 Daily Journal DAR 857·1999 WL 25684
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 1999F027349, F028879California8,495 words

Opinion

Opinion

Vartabedian, J.

The assignee of a security interest in a deed of trust unilaterally signed an agreement subordinating the deed of trust to a subsequent deed of trust. Thereafter, the assignor paid its secured debt and the earlier deed of trust was reconveyed to it. When the trustor of the subsequent deed of trust defaulted, the assignor asserted its lien had first priority. However, the beneficiary of the subsequent deed of trust contended, in reliance on the subordination agreement, that it had first priority. Among other findings, the trial court determined the subordination agreement was ineffective. It entered judgments and awarded attorney fees in accordance with this underlying finding. Various parties have appealed from different aspects of the judgment. We affirm the judgment in its entirety.

Facts and Procedural History

In 1988, Triple A Management Company, Inc. (hereafter Triple A) bought 140 acres near Kingsburg from Western Farm Credit Bank (hereafter Western). Western secured its purchase money loan of $504,000 to Triple A with a first deed of trust on the property. Triple A farmed the property.

Triple A agreed, in 1992, to sell 20.4 acres of the property to Greenwood…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.