O'NEIL

O'NEIL v. General Security Corp.

Good Law
1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 304·4 Cal. App. 4th 587·5 Cal. Rptr. 2d 712·92 Daily Journal DAR 3356·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2145
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 11, 1992D013286California6,610 words

Opinion

Opinion

Froehlich, J.

In this action Gloria C. O’Neil et al. (collectively Judgment Creditors) filed a cross-complaint against cross-defendants General Security Corporation et al. (collectively Refinancers). Judgment Creditors’ cross-complaint sought to have a particular trust deed, which encumbered certain real property in favor of Judgment Creditors and secured a promissory note in which the various Judgment Creditors held fractional interests, declared senior to Refinancers’ trust deed. The cross-complaint also sought an order compelling Refinancers to “marshal assets” by first pursuing other assets allegedly available to repay the indebtedness owed them.

Refinancers moved for judgment on the pleadings as to Judgment Creditors’ cross-complaint. Refinancers’ motion essentially argued that Judgment Creditors, by obtaining a monetary judgment on the underlying note in an earlier action against the debtors, had forfeited any further rights to pursue the security for the note (i.e., the trust deed) and therefore lacked “standing” to pursue the cross-complaint. The trial court granted Refinancers’ motion. Judgment Creditors appeal from the subsequent order dismissing their cross-complaint.

Our…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.