Moya

People v. Moya

Good Law
1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 380·4 Cal. App. 4th 912·6 Cal. Rptr. 2d 323·92 Daily Journal DAR 3728·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2386
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 17, 1992Docket Nos. E007821, E008374California1,500 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hollenhorst, J.

After a jury trial, all three defendants, Rigoberto Salazar Angulo (Rigo), Jose Manuel Moya (Moya) and Blanca Angulo-Rodriguez (Blanca), were found guilty of kidnapping for ransom (Pen. Code, § 209, subd. (a) and conspiracy to commit kidnapping for ransom. (§§ 182, 209.) Blanca was also convicted of one count of burglary. (§ 459.) Defendants were each sentenced to life with possibility of parole for the conspiracy and kidnapping counts. With respect to Rigo and Moya the court ordered the life sentences for the kidnapping and conspiracy counts to run concurrently. The court, acting pursuant to section 654, stayed the life sentence on the conspiracy charge in sentencing Blanca but imposed an upper term of six years for the burglary charge to run concurrently with her life sentence on the kidnapping charge.

On appeal, defendants raise the following issues: (1) the trial court erred in admitting the prior recorded testimony of Letecia Melecio; (2) the court erred in admitting the prior recorded testimony of Vanessa Angulo Moya; (3) the court erred in its instructions regarding mistake of fact and mistake of law (CALJIC Nos. 4.35 & 4.36 ); (4) the court failed to instruct on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.