In Re Anthony S.

People v. Anthony S.

Good Law
1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 350·4 Cal. App. 4th 1000·6 Cal. Rptr. 2d 214·92 Daily Journal DAR 3699·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2385
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 18, 1992B055868California2,312 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

The People appeal following dismissal of a Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 petition after a motion to suppress evidence

was granted. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 700.1.) The petition alleged that Anthony S. unlawfully possessed a videocassette recorder (VCR) with an altered identification number, a short-barreled rifle, and a pistol without a serial number. (Pen. Code, §§ 537e, subd. (a), 12020, subd. (a), 12094.) The People contend that a “consent search term” condition of juvenile probation, standing alone, provides a constitutionally reasonable basis for the search of Anthony’s locked room. The California Supreme Court opinion in People v. Bravo (1987) 43 Cal.3d 600 [ 238 Cal.Rptr. 282 , 738 P.2d 336 ] dictates that the People’s contention is meritorious. We reverse.

Anthony was a member of the “Ventura Avenue Gangsters” gang and subject to a “consent search term” as a condition of an earlier declaration of wardship. The “consent search term” provided: “You shall submit to a search of your person, your residence, your vehicle or any personal or real property under your control, at any time, by a probation officer or any law enforcement officer with or without a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.