Cantu

Cantu v. Resolution Trust Corp.

Good Law
1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 347·4 Cal. App. 4th 857·6 Cal. Rptr. 2d 151·92 Daily Journal DAR 3658·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2321
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 17, 1992B057053California10,242 words

Opinion

Opinion

Woods, J.

Appeal from a judgment of dismissal by the Los Angeles County Superior Court, the Honorable Valerie Baker, Judge Presiding, following the sustaining of demurrers without leave to amend. We affirm.

I.

Introduction

Appellant Cesar C. Cantu’s (Cantu) first amended complaint alleges that defendants Lincoln Savings & Loan Association (Lincoln) and Robin S. Symes, its former president (collectively, the Lincoln defendants), through their attorneys, Parker, Milliken, Clark, O’Hara and Samuelian and Robert A. Gutkin (collectively, the Parker defendants) improperly initiated an inter-pleader action by naming Cantu as a claimant.

Cantu alleges that the defendants tortiously prosecuted the interpleader action because (a) there were no competing claimants to the stake, and (b) they named Cantu as a claimant to the stake to create a false appearance of a controversy which did not exist, all in an effort to relieve Lincoln of funds to which it asserted no claim.

II.

Contentions

Cantu’s appeal presents, in essence, two fundamental contentions for this court to resolve: first, whether or not the defendants properly filed the interpleader action based on a dispute between…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.