Ontiveros

Ontiveros v. Los Angeles County

Good Law
611 F. Supp. 2d 1090·2009 WL 1204356·2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41334
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 18, 2009CV 08-40220-VAP (RC)California3,168 words

Opinion

Opinion

Phillips, J.

JUDGMENT

IT IS ADJUDGED that Judgment shall be entered: (1) dismissing plaintiffs first and second claims for relief without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; (2) dismissing plaintiffs third claim for relief as barred by the statute of limitations; and (3) dismissing plaintiffs state law claims without prejudice.

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636 , the Court has reviewed the complaint along with the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman, and has made a de novo determination.

IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted; (2) plaintiffs first and second claims for relief shall be dismissed without prejudice due to plaintiffs failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and Judgment shall be entered accordingly; (3) plaintiffs third claim for relief shall be dismissed as barred by the statute of limitations, and Judgment shall be entered accordingly; and (4) plaintiffs state law claims shall be dismissed without prejudice, and Judgment shall be entered accordingly.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.