Legault

People v. Legault

Good Law
115 Cal. Rptr. 2d 352·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 185·2002 Daily Journal DAR 449·95 Cal. App. 4th 178·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 348
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 2002E028707California1,042 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hollenhorst, J.

On August 16, 2000, San Bernardino police arrested defendant after he bought $10 worth of cocaine from an undercover officer during a reverse sting operation. A felony complaint charged him with possession of cocaine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350, subd. (a)). Pursuant to a negotiated agreement, he pled no contest to the charge in exchange for formal probation and 90 days in county jail. He agreed to a Cruz waiver with the understanding that the court “would then be free to sentence [him] to the maximum term set forth on the plea form” if he “fail[ed] to appear for sentencing, commit[ted] any new offense while out on this O[wn] R[ecognizance release], or fail[ed] to report to the probation department . . . .” The trial court released him on his own recognizance pending sentencing on October 18, 2000. Before the October sentencing date, he was taken into custody on a Cruz violation for possession of drug paraphernalia. On November 27, 2000, he admitted that he had violated the Cruz waiver and the trial court sentenced him to the upper three-year prison term.

Defendant appeals, arguing the passage, 20 days before he was sentenced, of Proposition 36, now Penal Code sections…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.