Kajima Engineering & Construction, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
116 Cal. Rptr. 2d 187·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 1005·2002 Daily Journal DAR 1173·95 Cal. App. 4th 921·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 950
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 2002B149642California5,140 words

Opinion

Opinion

Perluss, J.

Kajima Engineering and Construction, Inc. (Kajima) sued the City of Los Angeles (the City), claiming it was owed payment for work on a reconstruction project at the Badger Avenue Bridge in the Port of Los Angeles. The City cross-complained, alleging causes of action for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The City later amended its cross-complaint and added 19 causes of action.

Kajima moved under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 to strike the amended cross-complaint as a SLAPP (strategic lawsuits against public participation) suit. The trial court initially granted the motion. On the City’s motion, however, the trial court reversed its prior decision and reinstated all but the 12th cause of action in the amended cross-complaint. Kajima appeals, contending the other 18 causes of action added by the amended cross-complaint should have been stricken. We affirm.

The test for determining whether an action is a SLAPP suit within the purview of section 425.16 is generally well defined by the case law. (See, e.g., Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & Opportunity (1999) 19 Cal.4th 1106 [ 81 Cal.Rptr.2d 471 , 969 P.2d 564 ];…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.