Thomsen

Thomsen v. Western Elec. Co., Inc.

Good Law
512 F. Supp. 128·1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11681
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 1981C 79-2781 RPACalifornia2,777 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aguilar, J.

OPINION AND ORDER

This is an action in which six installers employed by Western Electric Co., Inc., (Western) claim that certain personnel policies restricting employee movement within the Bell Telecommunications System (the Bell System) violate the antitrust laws. Each plaintiff sought transfer to the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company (Pacific), but transfer was denied based upon the so-called “no-switching” agreements between Western and Pacific, which are discussed more fully below. Plaintiffs have brought suit under §§ 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act.

Background.

The record before the Court establishes the following undisputed facts. American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T) is the parent company of the Bell System. The Bell System is comprised of AT&T, Western, Bell Telephone Laboratories, and twenty-three operating telephone companies, including Pacific. AT&T owns and operates connecting telecommunications lines and together with the Bell operating companies furnishes nationwide long distance service. Pacific, an 89.9% owned subsidiary of AT&T, provides telephone service within California. Western, which is wholly-owned by AT&T, manufactures telecommunications…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.