Roden

This is now the third time these parties have brought their arguments to this court. “The [first] time, we affirmed a postjudgment order interpreting [and implementing] a judgment that entitled Donald R. Roden (Roden) to collect cash and employment benefits from his former employer, Bergen Brunswig Corporation. (Roden v. Bergen Brunswig Corp. (2003) 107 Cal.App.4th 620, 623, 625 [ 132 Cal.Rptr.2d 549 ] [(hereafter Roden I)].)” (Roden v. AmerisourceBergen Corp. (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 211, 213 [ 29 Cal.Rptr.3d 810 ] (hereafter Roden II).) The second time, we dismissed an appeal from an order permitting postjudgment discovery. (Roden II, supra, 130 Cal.App.4th at p. 214 .) Now, we address a second postjudgment order interpreting and implementing the judgment.

In his appeal, Donald R. Roden claims the court erred in awarding him only $14,432,141.74 in employment benefits, over and above the $5 million settlement amount previously awarded, and in denying his request for loan forgiveness. In its cross-appeal, AmerisourceBergen Corporation (AmerisourceBergen), successor by merger to Bergen Brunswig Corporation (Bergen), counters that the court erred in awarding the additional…