Foster

People v. Foster

Good Law
155 Cal. App. 4th 331·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 1569·65 Cal. Rptr. 3d 869
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 2007B185709California2,024 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

Defendant wishes to dissuade a victim from testifying against him in a criminal proceeding. He asks a third party to tell the victim not to testify against him. The third party agrees to do so, but does not relate defendant’s message to the victim. Here we hold sufficient evidence supports defendant’s conviction of Penal Code section 136.1, subdivision (a)(2).

Kevin Dewayne Foster appeals a judgment following his conviction of, among other things, assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury (§ 245, subd. (a)(1)), count 1, a felony. He also appeals his conviction of attempting to dissuade a witness from testifying (§ 136.1, subd. (a)(2)), count 2, a felony.

[[/]]

We conclude, among other things, that: (1) Foster’s phone call asking a third party to deliver a message to a witness that she should not testify against him was an attempt to dissuade a witness under section 136.1, subdivision (a)(2); (2) giving an unnecessary CALJIC No. 2.61 instruction to jurors was not prejudicial error; (3) the court properly applied section 1170.15 in sentencing Foster; and (4) the court did not violate Cunningham by imposing an upper term for assault. (Cunningham v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.