Shields

People v. Shields

Good Law
155 Cal. App. 4th 559·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 1584·65 Cal. Rptr. 3d 922
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 2007D050034California1,777 words

Opinion

Opinion

Haller, J.

Jimmy Shields has been committed to the custody of the state Department of Mental Health as a sexually violent predator (SVP) since 2001. In 2005, the People filed a petition to recommit Shields. The petition was granted, and Shields was committed for an indeterminate term. Shields challenges this commitment order.

Shields’s challenge is based on an amendment to Welfare and Institutions Code section 6604, which changed the term of commitment for an SVP from a two-year term to an indeterminate term. Shields asserts the court had no jurisdiction to find him to be an SVP and recommit him because section 6604’s two-year commitment procedure has been eliminated and the amended SVP statute fails to expressly refer to persons already confined for two-year terms under former section 6604. We reject this contention because Shields’s proposed statutory interpretation is contrary to the clear legislative intent. The commitment order is affirmed.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

After repeated instances of predatory sexual conduct, in 2001 Shields was found to be an SVP and committed to a two-year period of confinement as authorized under former section 6604. The commitment was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.