RAMANATHAN

RAMANATHAN v. Bank of America

Good Law
155 Cal. App. 4th 1017·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 1625·66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 471·101 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1244
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 30, 2007A113611California5,776 words

Opinion

Opinion

Horner, J.

INTRODUCTION

Section 24, paragraph Fifth, of 12 United States Code, the National Bank Act (NBA), provides the following powers to a duly organized national banking association: “To elect or appoint directors, and by its board of directors to appoint a president, vice president, cashier, and other officers, define their duties, require bonds of them and fix the penalty thereof, dismiss such officers or any of them at pleasure, and appoint others to fill their places.” ( 12 U.S.C. § 24 , par. Fifth (Section 24 (Fifth)).) Courts have long recognized that the power conferred by Section 24 (Fifth) on national banks to dismiss its officers “at pleasure” is protected by the doctrine of preemption from all state law claims filed by their former officers for breach of an employment agreement. (See, e.g., Mackey v. Pioneer Nat. Bank (9th Cir. 1989) 867 F.2d 520 , 524—536.) Courts have also acknowledged the doctrine of preemption protects national banks that dismiss their officers under Section 24 (Fifth) from state law discrimination claims filed by their former officers, although in this regard, courts have differed on whether such preemption is total or partial. (Compare…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.