Jafari

Jafari v. EMC Ins. Companies

Good Law
155 Cal. App. 4th 885·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 1609·66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 359
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 2007B192640California6,406 words

Opinion

Opinion

JOHNSON, Acting P.J.

This is a coverage action by an insured against his insurer stemming from an action in which a customer sued the insured for, among other claims, assault and battery committed by the insured's business's manager in an altercation with the customer on the business' premises. The insurer moved for summary judgment claiming the manager's actions allegedly taken in self-defense were nevertheless intentional and deliberate, and thus outside the policy's coverage for "accidents." The trial court granted the insurer's motion for summary judgment and dismissed the action. Because existing case law indicates acts committed by an insured in self-defense can be deemed an "accident," the underlying case raised the possibility of coverage under the policy. We thus conclude the trial court erred in finding the insurer had no duty to defend the insured on the ground the manager's acts were deliberate and intentional. Accordingly, we reverse.

Plaintiff and appellant is Davar Jafari, doing business as Glendora Tire & Brake Center. During the incident at issue in this case, he was the named insured under a garage liability policy issued by respondents, EMC Insurance Companies…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.