De Santiago v. D AND G PLUMBING, INC.

Good Law
155 Cal. App. 4th 365·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 1570·65 Cal. Rptr. 3d 882
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 2007E041294California3,961 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gaut, J.

Intervener and appellant Star Insurance Company (Star) appeals from a judgment of dismissal for failing to bring its complaint in intervention to trial within the five-year statutory period. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 583.310, 583.360.)

Star contends the five-year limitation period did not bar its action because the impracticability exception, based on court congestion, tolled the five-year limitation period. We disagree and affirm the judgment.

1. Facts

Plaintiff Joaquin De Santiago suffered a work-related injury when a coemployee, defendant Daniel Flores, discharged a nail gun and struck De Santiago in his left eye.

On February 2, 2001, De Santiago filed a personal injury complaint against Flores and his employer, D and G Plumbing, Inc. (D&G). De Santiago later added as Doe defendants, MR Development, Inc., doing business as A & M Construction (MR Development) and A & M Framing, Inc.

D&G cross-complained against A & M Framing, Inc., MR Development, and Juan Gabriel Fernandez. MR Development cross-complained against D&G and Flores.

On August 23, 2002, De Santiago’s employer’s worker’s compensation insurance carrier, Star, administered by Gallagher Bassett Services, filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.