Comerica Bank v. Whitehall Specialties, Inc.

Good Law
352 F. Supp. 2d 1077·2004 WL 3101564·55 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 800·2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27328
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaOctober 28, 2004EDCV 04-744 RT(SGLX)California3,851 words

Opinion

Opinion

Timlin, J.

ORDER 1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND THIS ACTION TO STATE COURT, AND 2) DENYING DEFENDANT WHITEHALL SPECIALITIES’ MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE AS MOOT

The court, Judge Robert J. Timlin, has read and considered plaintiffs Comerica Bank (“Comerica”), LaSalle Business Credit, Inc. (“LaSalle”), HSBC Business Credit (USA), Inc. (“HSBC”), and GMAC Commercial Credit, LLC (“GMAC”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”)’s motion to remand, defendants Whitehall Specialities, Inc. (“Whitehall”), Steve Fawcett (“Fawcett”), Cees Wit (“Wit”), and John Lynch (“Lynch”) (collectively, “Defendants”)’s opposition, and Plaintiffs’ reply. Based on such consideration, the court concludes as follows;

I.

BACKGROUND

On October 31, 1998, Comercia, acting as an agent of a bank group comprised of LaSalle, HSBC, GMAC (“Bank Group”), entered into a Credit Agreement (“Agreement”) with A & J Cheese Co. (“A & J Cheese”), a company owned and directed by Jack Gaglio (“Gaglio”). Pursuant to the Agreement, the Bank Group agreed to make loans to A & J Cheese from time to time based on its inventory and accounts receivables (“receivables”). In return, the Bank Group received a security interest in A & J Cheese’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.