STEINHART

STEINHART v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
155 Cal. App. 4th 1082·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 1624·66 Cal. Rptr. 3d 458
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 2007B190957California5,351 words

Opinion

Opinion

Plaintiff and appellant Lorraine Steinhart (Steinhart) appeals a judgment of dismissal following the sustaining without leave of a demurrer interposed by defendant and respondent County of Los Angeles (the County) to Steinhart's original complaint.

In this action for refund of real estate taxes paid, the essential issue presented is whether Steinhart's acquisition of a life estate in real property upon the death of her sister constituted a change of ownership so as to trigger a reassessment.

We conclude the conveyance of a life estate to Steinhart was not a transfer "substantially equal to the value of the fee interest." (Rev. & Tax.Code, § 60.) [1] Therefore, there was no change in ownership for purposes of Proposition 13.

Accordingly, the judgment of dismissal is reversed with directions to reinstate the complaint.

During her lifetime, Steinhart's sister, Esther Helfrick, created a living trust into which she transferred the subject real property in Sherman Oaks, California. Under the terms of the trust, if Steinhart were to survive Helfrick, Steinhart would have the right to "occupy and use ... the residential property, for so long as she lives." Helfrick died…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.