Munoz

Munoz v. City of Palmdale

Good Law
1999 Cal. App. LEXIS 886·75 Cal. App. 4th 367·89 Cal. Rptr. 2d 229·99 Daily Journal DAR 10337·99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8127
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 1999B122751California1,944 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ortega, J.

In this opinion, we consider whether an unpaid volunteer who helped serve coffee at a municipal senior center is exempt, as a matter of law, from being considered a municipal employee for respondeat superior liability purposes. Plaintiff was injured at the senior center .when a coffee pot fell from a serving shelf and spilled hot coffee on her leg. The trial court entered summary judgment for the defendant City of Palmdale (City) after concluding, as a matter of law, that the unpaid volunteer who had placed the pot on the shelf was neither an employee nor servant for respondeat superior liability purposes.

Under the volunteer exclusion of Labor Code section 3352, subdivision (i), unpaid volunteers of public agencies are excluded from the definition of “employee” for workers’ compensation purposes. Applying the volunteer exclusion and the public policy represented thereby to this case, we conclude, as a matter of law, that the unpaid volunteer who placed the pot on the shelf was neither an employee nor servant of the City for respondeat superior liability purposes. Accordingly, we affirm the summary judgment for the City.

Background

The facts presented below on summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.