Kerollis

Kerollis v. Department of Motor Vehicles

Good Law
75 Cal. App. 4th 1299·89 Cal. Rptr. 2d 826
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 29, 1999A083415, A084708, A084738California2,973 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lambden, J.

In these consolidated appeals, we consider the question of whether the California State Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) may suspend a person’s driving privilege pursuant to Vehicle Code section 13353.2 for a breath-alcohol result expressed as grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath instead of blood-alcohol concentration. (Unless otherwise indicated, all statutory references hereafter are to the Vehicle Code.) The trial court ruled in each of these cases that section 13353.2 and section 1220.4 of title 17 of the California Code of Regulations (hereafter referred to as regulation 1220.4) require the breath-alcohol concentrations to be converted into an equivalent blood-alcohol concentration. Accordingly, it granted the petitions for writ of mandate filed by Caryl Jessica Kerollis, Clifford F. Schwarberg, Jr., and Sara K. Giddins and ordered the DMV to set aside the suspension of their driving privileges. We conclude that the trial court erred and reverse the judgments.

Factual and Procedural Background

Kerollis

Caryl Jessica Kerollis was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol in violation of section 23152 on July 21, 1997. She took a breath test, which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.