Sears

Sears v. Morrison

Good Law
1999 Cal. App. LEXIS 1024·76 Cal. App. 4th 577·90 Cal. Rptr. 2d 528·99 Daily Journal DAR 11991·99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9335
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 29, 1999C029431California5,142 words

Opinion

Opinion

Morrison, J.

Under the rescue doctrine, an actor is usually liable for injuries sustained by a rescuer attempting to help another person placed in danger by the actor’s negligent conduct. The question here is whether an actor is liable for injuries sustained by a person who is trying to rescue the actor from his own negligence. The answer is yes.

John D. Morrison put a swamp cooler on a furniture dolly and removed its sides, exposing the machinery. He was working on it, while it was running, when he tripped on an electrical cord while trying to empty an ashtray, causing the swamp cooler to fall on him. Elda R. Sears, who had been with Morrison while he was working on the cooler, tried to help him. Because of his poor medical condition and difficulty in breathing, she thought he might have a heart attack or be unable to breathe with the heavy machine on top of him. When she tried to lift the swamp cooler off of Morrison, her hand was severely cut by a moving part.

Sears sued Morrison and his mother (now deceased), who owned the property. The trial court granted a defense motion for summary judgment because “The rescue doctrine does not apply in this case.” Sears filed a notice of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.