Sdpoa

San Diego Police Officers Ass'n v. San Diego Police Department

Good Law
1999 Cal. App. LEXIS 968·76 Cal. App. 4th 19·90 Cal. Rptr. 2d 6·99 Daily Journal DAR 11271·99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8828
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 2, 1999D031470California1,378 words

Opinion

Opinion

McINTYRE, J.

San Diego Police Officers Association and Garry Collins (SDPOA) appeal from a judgment discharging a writ of mandamus and granting attorney fees. The primary issue on appeal is whether Penal Code section 148.6 (hereafter section 148.6). applies in situations other than when a citizen makes an allegation of misconduct by a police officer during the performance of his or her duties. We hold it does not. Additionally, we hold that the award of attorney fees was well within the trial court’s discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.

Factual and Procedural Background

Section 148.6, subdivision (a) provides:

SDPOA filed a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the San Diego Police Department (the Police Department) to issue the advisory warning set forth in section 148.6 and require the complainant’s signature in every instance in which a person makes a complaint regarding a police officer, including equal employment opportunity (EEO) complaints made by other police officers and civilian employees of the Police Department, and complaints of on- or off-duty criminal activity by an officer. The Police Department responded that section 148.6 required it to issue the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.