McGill

McGill v. MJ Brock & Sons, Inc.

Good Law
76 Cal. App. 4th 1396·91 Cal. Rptr. 2d 135
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 2000E020452California4,009 words

Opinion

Opinion

Certified for Partial Publication. [*]

McKINSTER, J.

The plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment entered against them after the trial court determined that their action was barred by the statute of limitation. We reverse.

The plaintiffs own houses in a residential subdivision known as Rolling Ridge which is adjacent to State Route 71 ("Highway 71") in Chino Hills. With one exception, the plaintiffs purchased their homes in 1987 from the builder, M.J. Brock & Sons, Inc. ("Brock"). Plaintiffs Ben and Kristen Romero purchased their home in 1990 from the initial buyer.

The plaintiffs sued a variety of defendants, including Brock, in 1994. As amended, the complaint asserted 13 counts against Brock, seeking damages and rescission on theories of intentional, negligent or innocent misrepresentation (counts 1-8 & 25), mutual or unilateral mistake (counts 9 & 10), failure of consideration (count 11), and breach of contract (count 12). In substance, the plaintiffs alleged that when the plaintiffs bought their houses from Brock, Brock had affirmatively represented that buyers would enjoy peace, tranquillity and a pleasant view, and that Brock had failed to disclose to the plaintiffs the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.