Lambert

Lambert v. General Motors

Good Law
1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 955·67 Cal. App. 4th 1179·79 Cal. Rptr. 2d 657·98 Daily Journal DAR 11822·98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8488
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 18, 1998E018260California2,381 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gaut, J.

1. Introduction

Defendant General Motors (General Motors) appeals from a judgment against it after a jury trial and from an order denying its motions for new trial and judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Plaintiff Robbie Lambert (plaintiff) was injured in an accident which occurred while he was driving a 1985 Chevrolet Blazer manufactured by General Motors. Because the jury rendered an inconsistent verdict, we reverse.

2. Facts

After midnight on July 30, 1990, plaintiff was returning home from a camping trip at Lake Havasu. Plaintiff was driving a 1985 Chevrolet Blazer west on Interstate 40. The Blazer was owned by Tu V. Harley (Harley). Gerald Martin DeWitt (DeWitt), a passenger, was asleep next to Lambert. About 1:30 a.m., the Blazer, with its high beams on and traveling 65 to 70 miles per hour, passed a truck driven by Mark Gerald Pretz (Pretz). Pretz saw that plaintiff was slumped over the wheel and had probably fallen asleep. Pretz then watched the Blazer veer off the highway and begin to roll. Plaintiff suffered severe injuries rendering him quadriplegic. DeWitt was not seriously hurt.

Plaintiff alleged a cause of action for strict products liability against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.