Zamora

Zamora v. Shell Oil Co.

Good Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 409·55 Cal. App. 2d 204·55 Cal. App. 4th 204·63 Cal. Rptr. 2d 762·97 Daily Journal DAR 6709
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 22, 1997D021844California3,979 words

Opinion

Opinion

McDonald, J.

Shell Oil Company (Shell) appeals 14 of 34 judgments entered in an action by 34 homeowners against Shell and others including Western Plastic and Rubber Company (Western) for defective polybutylene (PB) pipes used in the construction of the plumbing systems in their homes. Shell contends the court erred by allowing the jury to determine Shell was liable for negligence even though the PB pipes in 14 homes did not leak or otherwise fail. Shell further contends the court erred by ruling that economic loss alone can support a tort cause of action.

Western was found strictly liable to the 34 homeowners, but it appeals only the postjudgment order awarding homeowners their costs as prevailing parties under Code of Civil Procedure section 1032. Western contends it was the section 1032 prevailing party because the homeowners ultimately recovered no net monetary award after settlement amounts with other defendants were credited against the jury’s damage awards.

We reverse the 14 judgments against Shell from which Shell appeals and affirm the order awarding the 34 homeowners their section 1032 costs against Western. Western has not appealed the judgments against it in favor of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.