Fujitsu Microelectronics, Inc. v. Assessment Appeals Bd. of San Diego

Good Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 480·55 Cal. App. 2d 1120·55 Cal. App. 4th 1120·64 Cal. Rptr. 2d 465·97 Daily Journal DAR 7599
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 20, 1997D023509California1,439 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jones, J.

Appellant Fujitsu Microelectronics, Inc. (hereafter Fujitsu) appeals a judgment in favor of the Assessment Appeals Board of the County of San Diego (hereafter the Board).

Fujitsu sued the Board on December 14, 1993, claiming a refund of property taxes imposed for the tax year 1992-1993. Fujitsu had filed an administrative claim for reduced assessment with the Board on August 27, 1992, which was denied following a hearing on March 18, 1993. The claim asserted that the San Diego County Assessor (hereafter Assessor) applied improper depreciation rates for certain personal property and fixtures of Fujitsu.

Fujitsu contends an accelerated depreciation rate on its personal property is warranted, based on a study of depreciation rates of semiconductor manufacturing equipment by Arthur D. Little, Inc. (hereafter the ADL report). The Board refused to admit the ADL report into evidence, but the substance of the report was pursued through the testimony of Fujitsu’s representative at the hearing. Essentially, the report concludes that semiconductor property depreciates more rapidly than other types of personal property. Fujitsu contends that ignoring the depreciation rates…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.