White

People v. White

Good Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 463·55 Cal. App. 2d 914·55 Cal. App. 4th 914·64 Cal. Rptr. 2d 245·97 Daily Journal DAR 7357
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 10, 1997D025862California785 words

Opinion

Opinion

Huffman, J.

In September 1991, as part of a plea bargain, Moses White, Jr., pled guilty to continuous sexual abuse of a child in violation of Penal Code section 288.5, subdivision (a). He was sentenced to 16 years in prison with the execution of the sentence stayed pending a 5-year grant of probation.

In July 1995 White’s probation was revoked and he was resentenced by stipulation to the middle term of 12 years. The court imposed a $100 restitution fíne and ordered $789.66 in direct restitution to the victim. Both the fine and restitution ordered were to be paid from prison wages pursuant to section 2085.5.

White has appealed. His appeal does not challenge his plea, the probation revocation, the sentence imposed or the amounts of the fine and restitution order. Remarkably, this appeal challenges, on constitutional grounds, the portion of the sentence which requires that the $789.66 be paid out of prison wages. The collection procedure, White argues, violates the prohibition against ex post facto legislation. We will find no violation and affirm.

Discussion

At the time of the offense in this case White was subject to a restitution fine of up to $10,000. He was also subject to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.