MacIas

MacIas v. Hartwell

Good Law
55 Cal. App. 4th 669·64 Cal. Rptr. 2d 222
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 5, 1997B103066California2,281 words

Opinion

Opinion

Henrietta Macias appeals from a judgment striking her libel complaint and dismissing the action pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. [1] The trial court found that the defamation action was a "SLAPP" suit (strategic lawsuit against public participation), that the alleged statements were privileged and not made with malice, and that there was no likelihood that she would prevail on her action. She was ordered to pay $44,445 attorney's fees. (§ 425.16, subd. (c).) We affirm.

The action arises out of a political flyer distributed to 10,000 union members prior to the election of union officers for the United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 1036 (Local 1036). In 1993, Local 1036 terminated appellant, the secretary-treasurer, for misuse of union funds. She filed a grievance and settled the matter before arbitration. Pursuant to a written settlement agreement, appellant resigned as union business agent and resigned from her elected position as secretary-treasurer of Local 1036. Local 1036 paid her $25,000 in exchange for a release of all claims against the union and its president, respondent George Hartwell.

In 1995, appellant ran against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.