Onofrio

Onofrio v. Rice

Good Law
1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 422·55 Cal. App. 2d 413·55 Cal. App. 4th 413·64 Cal. Rptr. 2d 74·97 Daily Journal DAR 6846
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 29, 1997G015003California3,858 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sonenshine, J.

Marshall D. and Myra Rice appeal from a judgment entered against them and in favor of Evelyn J. Onofrio after a court trial.

I

In June 1990, Onofrio was in serious financial trouble. The home in which she had lived since 1971 was in foreclosure and she was in bankruptcy. Delinquent on her first and second mortgages as well as community association dues, Onofrio was working with Ruth Gold to obtain new financing.

Although Marshall did not know Onofrio, he visited her on June 29 to inquire about the foreclosure sale scheduled for later that day. Onofrio told him the matter was taken care of, but he nevertheless attended the sale. Learning it had been postponed, Marshall approached Onofrio and gave her a business card, indicating he was a real estate broker specializing in foreclosure properties. Telling Onofrio he knew Gold and believed she did not know what she was doing, he invited Onofrio to call him for help.

Onofrio was satisfied with Gold’s services, but Marshall’s comments made her leery. In response to Onofrio’s call, the two met again. Wasting no time, Marshall prepared a promissory note and deed of trust indicating his wife, Myra Rice, would lend Onofrio…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.